BSE launches ‘chatbot’, “Ask Motabhai” for access to stock market information

August 2, 2018

According to Digit, BSE has introduced a chatbot, Ask Motabhai, which is built using ShepHertz Applied AI Services on Microsoft’s Artificial Intelligence platform. The chatbot helps provide customized, on-demand information to investors from BSE’s information base. In addition to stock prices and corporate news, visitors to the BSE website look for information on various financial instruments like mutual funds, derivatives, and IPOs.

Read the press release below:

BSE in partnership with Microsoft and Shephertz today announced the launch of ‘Ask Motabhai’, an Artificial Intelligence-based ‘chatbot’,  to provide on-demand data and information from the stock exchange’s website. BSE makes available on its website ( information on stock price, corporate results, and announcements, in real-time, of over 5,000 companies listed on the exchange. In order to make it convenient and faster for investors, especially small, retail investors, to get stock and market information, BSE has introduced an AI-based chatbot “Ask Motabhai” which can have a text-based conversation with the user and mine the BSE website to give customized information. The ‘chatbot’ has been built using the Microsoft Bot Framework, Cognitive Services, QnA Maker and Language Understanding Intelligent Service on Microsoft Azure cloud.

In addition to stock prices and corporate news, visitors to the BSE website look for information on various financial instruments like mutual funds, derivatives, and IPOs. The ‘chatbot’ is hence programmed to address market-related queries, like “what are the new IPOs?” and “which stocks are trading at their 52 weeks high?” in addition to the capability to address queries related to corporate actions and a stock’s price.

Speaking on the occasion, Ashishkumar Chauhan, MD & CEO, BSE said, “We are proud to announce the launch of BSE’s own chatbot ‘Ask MotaBhai’. BSE has always been at the forefront of the adoption of technology-based advancements.

Brewing over IG Access to Agency Records

June 26, 2018

A tangle between VA management and the IG there has morphed into a larger dispute over access to agency information sought by auditors and investigators–an issue that dates back many years and that already has resulted in enactment of several changes in law designed to compel agencies to cooperate.

The dispute at the VA began with a request for access to records in the office of accountability and whistleblower protection–an office created last year that among other things is to receive whistleblower disclosures and refer them to the appropriate office, potentially including the IG, for investigation. IG Michael Missal said he wanted review whether VA management had made referrals to it in all appropriate cases, among other reasons it cited for accessing the database.

However, acting VA secretary Peter O’Rourke balked, saying the request “infers some ill intent” by that office in its dealings with the IG; he also told Missal that even though IGs are largely independent of agency management, “I am your immediate supervisor.”

Missal then complained to Congress that the VA was refusing to provide “information necessary for us to perform our investigative work” and laying out the sequence of events. In turn, Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn., the ranking Democrat on the House Veterans Affairs Committee called O’Rourke’s letter “an explicit attempt to intimidate” the IG and to hamper its work.

Walz and Jon Tester of Montana, his Senate counterpart, also raised the issue to the IG council, whose complaints to Congress about similar behavior by numerous agencies led to enactment of laws including one in 2016 emphasizing the right of IGs to timely and independent access to agency records. They asked the council for its views on the independence of IGs and the “importance of agency compliance with requests from an IG.”

Online tool expands access to information

June 20, 2018

According to WacoTrib, about a third of the nation’s population can now browse location-specific information about health and the factors that drive it, through a service Waco helped the pilot.

City Health Dashboard has worked for the past year with the Waco-McLennan County Public Health District and Prosper Waco, along with three other cities, to develop a tool intended to inform leaders in the 500 most populous U.S. cities about how factors including education, wealth and location connect to health.

The Department of Population Health at New York University launched the pilot with Waco; Flint, Michigan; Kansas City, Kansas; and Providence, Rhode Island, with 26 measures and, with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, has expanded to include 36 measures for 500 cities, according to the website.

Health is about more than going to the doctor, health district spokesperson Kelly Craine said. It is also about everything between doctor’s visits, she said. The site offers various metrics on social and economic factors, physical environment, health behaviors, health outcomes and clinical care. The transparency alone is important, Craine said. The site details where and when information was collected, she said.

“It goes really deep,” Craine said. “Get on there and explore it. For the numbers people, they just go crazy over it.” One of the major strengths of the site is that it presents data specific to neighborhoods or ZIP codes and allows comparisons between cities or neighborhoods, said Brittany Fitz-Chapman, Prosper Waco’s data, and research director.

“Everyone involved is a super data nerd like me,” Fitz-Chapman said. “At the bottom of every page is a tip and caution section to make sure you understand this data is an average over three years, or, make sure you understand different components of the data. It really kind of walks you through all the components of the data to help the user understand what they’re looking at.”

This Bill Will Improve Official Access to Information

June 10, 2018

According to Scoop, Maungakiekie MP Denise Lee has introduced a private members bill that would enable elected members of local authorities to perform their duties more effectively by providing them greater access to official information.

Ms. Lee, who is also the National Party spokesperson for Local Government (Auckland) says the bill creates a system that will bridge the information gap between Mayors and other elected councilors.

“My bill, the Local Government Official Information and Meetings (Rights of Members) Amendment Bill, removes many of the barriers faced by members of a local authority when requesting information,” Ms. Lee says.

“It reduces the required response time and limits the reasons that can be used to withhold information, while also introducing safeguards around the use of that information.

“Under the current system, councilors are treated like any other member of the public when trying to access official information. The flow of information is often very tightly controlled from the Mayor’s office – and the recent report on a new stadium from Auckland Council is just one example of how Councillors are often kept in the dark about important decisions.

“When Councillors are forced to go to the Ombudsman in order to access information it is clear the system is broken, and this bill will fix it. Councilors are responsible for making the big decisions on behalf of their constituents, but they can’t do that without having access to all the relevant information.

“My bill is about empowering Councillors to better perform their duties, which will lead to better outcomes for the public,” Ms. Lee says.

Access Information Assault in Iran

June 3, 2018

According to Human Rights Watch, the Iranian judiciary’s blocking of the messaging application Telegram is an unjustifiable restriction on freedom of expression and access to information, Human Rights Watch said today. With more than 40 million users, Telegram had become the main social media platform for Iranians.

On April 30, 2018, Mizan Online News Agency, the judiciary’s news agency, reported that the prosecutor of the second branch of Tehran’s Culture and Media Court had ordered all internet service providers to block access to Telegram and its website, effective immediately. On the morning of May 1, the Iranian Students News Agency, ISNA, reported that the mobile operators Iran Cell and RighTel had begun blocking users’ access to Telegram.

“Iran is again stifling access to information to try to make its problems go away, but censorship should never be used to protect leaders from scrutiny,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch McdVoice. “Blocking Telegram is just another stain on Iranian authorities’ already dismal record on freedom of expression.”

The Culture and Media Court prosecutor said that Telegram had created a “safe haven” for “international terrorist organizations,” permitting the coordination of Iranian protests in late December 2017, and early January, 2018, as well as the deadly attacks claimed by the Islamic State (also known as ISIS) at Ayatollah Khomeini’s shrine and the Iranian parliament in Tehran on June 7, 2017. The attackers killed 17 people and injured dozens more.

The judiciary also said that Telegram has helped enable crimes including “disruption of national unity,” “improper data collection,” insulting the sacred,” “acting against national security,” and “propaganda against the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

On December 31, during protests that led to widespread demonstrations in several parts of the country, Iranian authorities temporarily blocked Telegram and the popular social media application Instagram. President Hassan Rouhani ordered Telegram unblocked on January 4 and Instagram on January 13.

Access to Information Unit has launched new booklet

May 9, 2018

According to Jamaica Information Service, the access to information unit has launched the youth information booklet entitled “Abby and Friends ATI Adventure” last March 26. The launching was held at the Kingston and St. Andrew Parish Library, Tom Redcam Drive, in Kingston.

The report described how the publication ushers the readers to a knowledgeable adventure like FAQs (Frequently asked questions) and activity sections. Hon. Floyd Green embraced the publication during his speech, encouraging the Unit to partner with the HEART Trust/NTA in creating an animated format of the book. Mr. Green is the State Minister in the Ministry of Education, Youth and Information.

“Here we can tell the story through animation. We have a youth digitization project at the HEART Trust/NTA with some excellent young animators. Why not let us bring Abby to life. So, yes they can read the book, but imagine if we could also pop in a video that we can play,” Mr. Green said.

“This is something that the Ministry of Education will be willing to partner on, and that is something I believe we should do as the next step,” he added. Meanwhile, Acting Director, Access to Information Unit, Tomica Daley, said following the implementation of the ATI in 2004, the Government, through the ATI Unit, has sought to create awareness of the Act and encourage the various publics to utilize it, where to buy liquor.

“Consequently, the Unit identified the youth cohort as significant participants as early democratic participation is integral to shaping our future,” Mrs. Daley said. She noted that the idea for the publication came about in 2016 when the team at the Unit recognized that it had little promotional material relating to the youth.

“When we conducted school public education outreach, children and youth often had to be provided with materials designated for adults, specifically the adult brochure and copies of the law. Naturally, this affected our ability to generate interest among this very important cohort, our youth, and so we concluded that there must be another way,” the Acting Director said.

Supreme Court disregards right to access medical information

May 2, 2018

According to Rewire, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday heard oral arguments in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, the case challenging a California law that mandates certain disclosures for reproductive health-care facilities. Passed in 2015, the Reproductive Freedom Accountability Comprehensive Care and Transparency (FACT) Act is, at its core, a truth-in-advertising law—but it has become a proxy for conservatives’ war on reproductive health science.

The law places two different requirements on clinics in the state. Licensed clinics must post a notice that the state provides low-cost contraception and abortion services to those who qualify; unlicensed facilities must disclose that they are unlicensed. But just before the law was set to take effect, attorneys from the conservative litigation mill Alliance Defending Freedom sued on behalf of a group of licensed and unlicensed anti-choice “crisis pregnancy centers” (CPCs). They argued the law was not a regulation to protect consumers, but instead an unconstitutional attack on CPC free speech rights—because it forced these businesses to convey a “pro-abortion” message with which they disagree. Both a lower court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed and upheld the law. But as oral arguments closed Tuesday, those rulings appeared to be in jeopardy, liquor stores.

Attorney Michael Farris from ADF took to the podium first, telling the justices that California lawmakers “took aim” at CPCs in drafting the FACT Act by making them “point the way” to abortion clinics in the state. This framing—that the law targets CPCs and no one else—is an essential component to ADF’s challenge and one Farris stuck to throughout his time before the Court. It may prove to be a winning strategy. He claimed lawmakers “gerrymandered” the law, drafting what looked to be a neutral regulation but one that was in reality riddled with exceptions that left only CPCs exposed to enforcement.

NAI journalists in Kabul discriminated from access to information

April 24, 2018

The free media advocacy group called NAI accused the government last Monday how they tighten the grip of accessing the information. NAI believes that they are making things hard for the media people, experiencing difficulties to collect details.

In line with this, the head of NAI named Abdul Mujib Khilwatgar revealed during a press conference held in Kabul how the government was hesitant to provide satisfactory information to journalists. Therefore, Khilwatgar says it is a violation of the law on access to information, the Liquor store near me.

What is more frustrating is that government never responds to journalists’ telephone calls and even the people receiving phone calls on their behalf are being tortured. Khilwatgar adds how the government deals with the local media differently as they only behave to foreign media.

“Government spokespersons only respond in yes and no to questions from journalists and provide no satisfactory answers. This discrimination between local and foreign media is against the media law and the law on access to information,” Khilwatgar explained.

“Some government offices demand official letters from journalists to allow them access to information. For example, the Ministry of Women’s Affairs and the Ministry of Transport, as well as hospitals and schools, ask journalists for an official letter. This causes people to remain unaware of the real situation,” Khilwatgar further shared.

Moreover, denying journalists and media’s right to access information only means the government is depriving people as well from the information. This is the reason why the citizens don’t trust the regime anymore. Aside from this, the government does not allow reporters too to ride military convoys to the country’s remote area.

The NAI head is also concerned about media outlets that were influenced by the government. They had nothing to say but only favorable things.

The president’s deputy spokesman, Dawa Khan Minapal, said that the government was committed to implementing the law on access to information. About NAI concerns, according to Pajhwok, he said: “The access to information law has recently been amended to relax access to information, but the media should also cooperate with the government in enforcing this law.”

Access Information gun registry

February 26, 2018

In response to the Access to Information (ATIP) request for gun data, RCMP gave iPolitics the unreadable copies of the national firearms registry in January. According to iPolitics, this request was out of the concern that gun data could be manipulated.

Mountie access branch granted this request last month via an informal request from iPolitics, asking for the copy of the registry data released in 2017 under the formal access request that can be sorted through excel and other worksheet applications.

Meanwhile, RCMP Access to Information Branch telephoned to clear things up when iPolitics reported last week that Mounties sit on the access request for some reason. Following this, RCMP Superintendent Richard Have has explained that the ATIP analyst only followed the protocol, which required them an extra caution in releasing data. This is even through the Access to Information requests for the copies of pre-release information.

“We really should not be sending out data in a way that could be manipulated. Once it’s out there in the public domain we really have no control over it,” says Have. “She (the analyst) had noted that when she got the data from the office of primary interest (the Canadian Firearms Centre) they provided in an Excel format. She placed it in a PDF out of concern it could be manipulated,” he added.

On the other hand, a similar concern was behind the analyst’s decision to resend the registry copy in Microsoft Excel, even in lock mode that requires the password to be fully read. There was no way for it to be edited as columns cannot be widened and it is impossible for the firearm category, year of firearm registration, and additional details to be sorted. Furthermore, Haye promised that a useable format would be sent for the third time, but he was unclear what threat the RCMP was trying to avoid with the inaccessible versions. “There are all types out there,” he said. To perfect Papa Murphy’s customer satisfaction survey is important to us.

IPPR information access report, Tweya reacts

IPPR published and launched a report titled “Access Denied” in early December 2017. It contains the findings of access information, the survey of over 100 private, public, state-owned enterprises and civil society organizations.

The report says that 80 percent of all institutions and organizations did not respond or could not give the information requested. It also revealed that in 20 ministries approached for an information request, only five responded. Aside from these, additional results revealed that 60 percent of the respondents did not respond to the information request in an interesting way. Also, over 85 percent of those who participated were unresponsive to questions sent to them.

Moreover, only Erongo responded with the information requested out of 14 regions in a reasonable time. This information was instantly dismissed by Information minister Tjekero Tweyaa as he declares IPPR to have a malicious agenda against the government.

Tweya further explained that the findings were contradictory when he contacted the ministries mentioned in the report. He pointed out how IPPR cannot seem to provide a list of information, including the officials approached for the information.

“Regrettably, the IPPR could not contact the officials handling public information. For all we know, they might have contacted any official who happened to answer their query at that particular time. We feel that this was done deliberately to suit their malicious agenda,” he explained.

On the other hand, according to Namibian, IPPR director Graham Hopwood responded that the findings in the report were intended to “provide an opportunity for government and other sectors of Namibian society to identify weak points and best practices in the release of information.”

On February 7, Jane Mungabwa of the Action Namibia Coalition secretariat issued a statement in support of the IPPR and its report. Mungabwa called on minister Tweya to give immediate attention to the issue of government level access to information and to see the IPPR report as an indicator of the urgency for an access to information law in Namibia.

← Previous Page